I mean, what happens isn't we see the graph and radically change our understanding of the world to fit it
-
-
The graph, like low N research more generally, is dangerous because if the people who view it see it fitting their priors, they feel encouraged that their view is evidence based.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bechhof @alicemazzy and
if the gss is the most egregious example of low-n social science you’ve ever encountered i’ve got bad news for you
2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
-
Replying to @bechhof @alicemazzy and
just “dangerous” how many journals do you think there are that have exclusively published more “dangerous“ material, for years and years?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @QuasLacrimas @alicemazzy and
Good number; that’s why there are people working to combat the issue
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bechhof @alicemazzy and
when you accuse a tweet of “dangerously” confirming some prior when the entire field of social science has been systematically distorted to confirm priors since before you were born... it makes it look like you’re only worried about *whose* priors
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @QuasLacrimas @alicemazzy and
Lots of exaggeration in this tweet
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bechhof @alicemazzy and
your faith in the academy is endearing
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
econ kids who think their advisors would defend them if they published something taboo are the most endearing of all, tbh
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.