What happened? https://twitter.com/lymanstoneky/status/991810342589206531 …
-
-
Never said most egregious
-
just “dangerous” how many journals do you think there are that have exclusively published more “dangerous“ material, for years and years?
-
Good number; that’s why there are people working to combat the issue
-
when you accuse a tweet of “dangerously” confirming some prior when the entire field of social science has been systematically distorted to confirm priors since before you were born... it makes it look like you’re only worried about *whose* priors
-
Lots of exaggeration in this tweet
-
your faith in the academy is endearing
-
Only some parts of it
-
econ kids who think their advisors would defend them if they published something taboo are the most endearing of all, tbh
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
yeah, just the idea that it's publicly reproducible and they probably didn't make the numbers up out of whole cloth is light years ahead of the competition
-
“this is dangerous it might reinforce someone’s priors” is brilliant why didn’t the Stasi think of that?
-
“Comrade, we have reports of an invalid causal inference... please evacuate the library immediately”
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.