I mean the supposed changes they seek to international norms, such as argued in section 4 of this (basically anti-interventionism):https://macropolo.org/reluctant-stakeholder-chinas-highly-strategic-brand-revisionism-challenging-washington-thinks/ …
like Tibet, Xinjiang, to a lesser extent other parts of Tarim Basin/Inner Mongolia it’s not like PRC is ideologically principled Wilsonian nationalism, so there is no equilibrium pt for their demands
-
-
I don't think they have any ambitions to expand beyond there. They claim less territory than the ROC.
-
:) well, what i’m telling you is that your gut instinct about how to tell whether Xi Jinping is a teddy bear doesn’t line up with the analysis ppl do to determine whether “just this once, honest” is consistent with evidence or BS (in general case)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.