yeah i think we’re thinking on the same lines (but i don’t get your exact pt about monogamy - isn’t that true of *any* strategy?)
...population heterogeneity as different evaluation functions (or w/e) that make ppl more/less attracted to the monogamous “play”
-
-
the ESS concept only makes sense when the “strategy” in q (here: the individual’s pay-off function) is transmitted to the next generation via reproductive success
-
yes? i'm not sure that's contradictory to my original formulation. the question is what kinds of decision rules could be an ESS, and under what ecological circumstances. many skeptics of monogamy act as tho it could never be an ESS, which is false. That said, ecologies change.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.