so data that doesn't describe the entire space of parameters effecting cognitive ability are not problematic ? PGS and SES leaves out many contextual details. 1 d correlations barely show stat significance with R^2 or p values. not problematic ? whatever
Okay if you agree with her there is nothing to discuss; she doesn’t understand how indicators work.
-
-
she doesn't have to, the issue is the quality of the data - GIGO
-
/sigh. Measurement error reduces the efficiency of GWAS and puts a ceiling on PGS variance, but it doesn't make GWAS impossible, and you can still get plenty of results even with crummy IQ measurements like UKBB.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.