Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
QuasLacrimas's profile
tantum
tantum
tantum
@QuasLacrimas

Tweets

tantum

@QuasLacrimas

qvi•petere•a•popvlo•fasces•sævasqve•secvres•imbibit•et•semper•victvs•tristisqve•recedit

Joined October 2016

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Monica H Green‏ @monicaMedHist Apr 1
      Replying to @mbeisen @johnhawks and

      Hello geneticists, someone from the other side here. (And co-signatory to BuzzFeed essay.) A question. Reich was given a platform by NYT for a piece that had no other purpose than to advertise his book. Presumably, he could have taken any amount of time he wanted to write it. 1/n

      1 reply 6 retweets 10 likes
    2. Monica H Green‏ @monicaMedHist Apr 1
      Replying to @monicaMedHist @mbeisen and

      Monica H Green Retweeted John Hawks

      As @johnhawks has noted, that *created* a news cycle: https://twitter.com/johnhawks/status/980468860016087040 …. The response that appeared in BuzzFeed was rejected by the NYT and had to be "shopped" elsewhere. Most of the signatories work on race & its real-world consequences. (See: the news any given day.) 2/n

      Monica H Green added,

      John Hawks @johnhawks
      Exhibit A: A week of elite media discussion of race and genetics following a book release and coordinated @nytimes editorial. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/23/opinion/sunday/genetics-race.html …
      Show this thread
      1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes
    3. Monica H Green‏ @monicaMedHist Apr 1
      Replying to @monicaMedHist @mbeisen and

      Criticism of evidence & argument is always called for. That's what we do as academics. But can we also acknowledge that there are real-world consequences for this sloppy conflation of "race" & "population", as you yourselves have acknowledged? What will be done about these? 3/end

      1 reply 5 retweets 11 likes
    4. Fungus The Bagelman‏Verified account @mbeisen Apr 1
      Replying to @monicaMedHist @johnhawks and

      I completely agree. Reich was shockingly sloppy in his language, and he too made scientific errors. His piece merits pushback on technical terms and, more importantly, because of the consequences of his sloppiness.

      4 replies 2 retweets 24 likes
    5. Fungus The Bagelman‏Verified account @mbeisen Apr 1
      Replying to @mbeisen @monicaMedHist and

      I tried to be clear that in criticizing the response I was in no way trying to defend everything Reich said.

      1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
    6. Fungus The Bagelman‏Verified account @mbeisen Apr 1
      Replying to @mbeisen @monicaMedHist and

      I was (and still am) frustrated that a piece that was correctly trying to point out the dangers of Reich's cavalier attitude about race when writing about genetics was in turn cavalier about genetics when writing about race.

      2 replies 1 retweet 10 likes
    7. Monica H Green‏ @monicaMedHist Apr 1
      Replying to @mbeisen @johnhawks and

      "Frustration" is widely shared, I assure you. But let's be clear about the context, timing, & stakes of this "debate." Reich *was given* a platform by NYT: his choice of context, timing. (Indeed, he was given a 2nd platform again this week: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/30/opinion/race-genetics.html ….) Given .. 1/n

      4 replies 1 retweet 6 likes
    8. Monica H Green‏ @monicaMedHist Apr 1
      Replying to @monicaMedHist @mbeisen and

      .. the international platform, a pointed, urgent & public response was called for. Perhaps I missed it, but I didn't see 67 geneticists publish a coordinated response less than a week after having to shop it to alternative venues. If that's in the works, I look forward to it. 2/2

      3 replies 1 retweet 11 likes
    9. Andrew Kern‏ @pastramimachine Apr 1
      Replying to @monicaMedHist @mbeisen and

      While you are engaging genetics as a co-author of the buzzfeed piece could you please explain what this paragraph means?pic.twitter.com/LMf7hYhcpj

      4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
    10. Monica H Green‏ @monicaMedHist Apr 1
      Replying to @pastramimachine @mbeisen and

      Hi @pastramimachine. Sorry, not going to take this bait. I don't speak for all the co-signatories. If you want to have a reasoned discussion of "race" & genetics, then put together a conference & arrange formal publication with referreeing that reflects disciplinary expertise.

      2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
      tantum‏ @QuasLacrimas Apr 1
      Replying to @monicaMedHist @pastramimachine and

      Do you mean that you signed on to a statement whose scientific claims you are not qualified to comment on? Or that you added your name to a statement you knew to be libelous drivel?

      7:45 PM - 1 Apr 2018
      0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2018 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info