Then engage with the critique of 'antipraxis'.
-
-
Replying to @parallaxoptics @Marav0ne and
I have so far, I'm just getting suspicious of the relentless misreading of the whole thing.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @parallaxoptics and
A good start would be to stop attributing petty motivations to a theory. But that seems to be the whole tamale.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @realMaxCastle @cyborg_nomade and
This is like complaining that any critique of Lenninism’s false party democracy is an ad hom, it can seem like that, but on the other hand it is part of Lenninism philosophically
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @KANTBOT20K @cyborg_nomade and
The problem is that the "they are all just academics in Cathedral army" is just bullshit and rests largely on Vince's position. It would be roughly equivalent if my only criticism of r/acc was that it was generated by minds the art world told to fuck off...
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @realMaxCastle @KANTBOT20K and
R/acc was generated by the mind of
@Outsideness before you "guys" cucked it and submitted it to genital mutilation...5 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @parallaxoptics @realMaxCastle and
In the Theory of Acceleration lectures, Land actually hesitates to embrace the idea that he is r/acc, arguing that 'right accelerationism' doesn't properly exist and emerges reflexively as a phrase only because left-accelerationism is invented.
2 replies 1 retweet 30 likes -
Replying to @Moctezuma_III @parallaxoptics and
He goes on to express disbelief at what a right-accelerationist project would actually entail, and that he'd prefer accelerationism without political pre-conditions. As far as I know, it was from that discussion that the term 'unconditional acceleration' emerged.
1 reply 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @Moctezuma_III @parallaxoptics and
So my suspicion of u/acc has generally been opposite of
@parallaxoptics (that the u/acc crowd are crypto-cathedralists), I've been concerned that the u/acc crowd are all Landian crypto-racists.4 replies 1 retweet 19 likes -
Replying to @Moctezuma_III @parallaxoptics and
how would the logic of the group dynamics produce that? idgi crypto-progs is easy: before l/acc, aligning with land’s acc had less political info value; once l/acc goes into schism ppl remaining in 1/acc are more righty on avg so it carries info
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
then ppl who agree with what is now “r/acc” but want to virtue signal invent a new label, they pick “u” out of hat at what pt in group dynamics would you see crypto-racists choosing to label as u/acc
-
-
Replying to @QuasLacrimas @Moctezuma_III and
inhumane kantian Retweeted Max Castle
inhumane kantian added,
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.