one under-explored element in feminism/-ization is that small family sizes mean vastly more fathers with no male heir to carry on family traditions
-
-
(btw this suggests that earlier marriage could roll back some of the damage: if he has an adolescent son-in-law to take under his wing, no incentive to push daughter into masculine specialization)
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Most obnoxious example I've seen are son-less military officers doing this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.