there are two basic frames for demoralization tactics: convince the enemy his allies won’t cooperate with him or that he should be seeking to cooperate with you
the big difference between them is one approach doesn’t rly req saying anything about what he’s fighting for, the other doesn’t req saying anything about who he’s fighting with
-
-
if your allies are cowards and snakes, you lose even if what you’re fighting for is worth a war if what you’re fighting for isn’t worth a war, you lose even if your allies are all 100% committed; you lose even if you win.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Examples!
-
on my blog the “disruption” post discusses a hypothetical alliance between pro-gay leftists and pro-muslim leftists, and why just providing them accurate info can break up alliance w/o offering a better deal to either side
-
But don't they know the information?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.