little pointer-hands in the margins 
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The journals hope this will be taken care of by people publishing "notes" in response to the articles. Problem is, authoring notes is not a road to professional academic success, so it's largely not done.
-
What's more, I'm not sure if it should be incumbent upon, or even desirable for, the journal to designate what is the "correct" academic consensus.
-
yes and no - to the extent journals can claim competence to do peer review at all, they can also say “this article has everything that article had, plus a lot more”
-
is it a judgment call? yes, esp in fuzzier cases. but it needs to be done and iiuc, you mean publishing “notes” on article in same journal, which sometimes marked as update, but this unhelpful - in ideal case 1 new article makes several older ones redundant at once
-
Yes, that's what I mean. I'll often hear other graduate students propose a correction to an article and be rebuffed with "that'd make a good note, but don't waste your time on that."
-
hopefully some ppl will find a way to “monetize it” (“tenurize”?) the way the princeton psych kids made their careers off the replication crisis
-
like, a browser app that auto-overlays newer work over superceded articles
-
Someone who's better at networks and programming than I should make one that, upon scrolling over a paper title/link, lists the top five most cited papers that directly cite the paper in question. That'd at least give context. esp. since most soc science papers don't have 5 cites
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.