This is a common myth these days: that evil racist old phenotypic anthropologists were All Wrong compared to what has been found by good anti-racist new genotypic anthropologists. In reality, about 95% or so overlap. https://twitter.com/TheDisproof/status/948660380884258816 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Steve_Sailer
I wrote about this too: expected to study blunders of naive craniometry/etc., to figure out what traps HBD should avoid, but it turns out they were pretty damn sophisticatedhttps://quaslacrimas.wordpress.com/2016/12/16/physical-anthropology-in-1950/ …
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes
Replying to @QuasLacrimas @Steve_Sailer
(No real surprise once I thought about it: the traits physical anthro studies are all polygenic, so pre-1960s anthropology not only found the same results, but even reached them in the same way, i.e. with similar concepts/ways of thinking)
2:12 PM - 3 Jan 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
3 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.