That's not true tho. Not even someone with a reductive, Humean account or reason would accept that. Reason can work out consequences of hypotheses without affirming them.
-
-
-
Exactly, I agree with you. But the propositions used by reason under ordinary circumstances ("in actual use", as you say) are doxa, not pistis
-
(And as anyone who has read Locke's "The reasonableness of Christianity" has seen, if like Locke you confuse doxa and pistis, you pollute Holy Scripture with the perversions of the unregenerate mind)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.