What are the limiting qualifiers on that analysis (is it in your grapes... I have it on my Kindle but haven't cracked it open)
-
-
Replying to @fides_et_cancri @mr_scientism
well, i don't know if we know what limits there are yet... still more in the phase of getting clear on what the limits might be so that we can distinguish conceptual limits from empirical hypotheses (which can be tested etc)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @QuasLacrimas @mr_scientism
I'm intensely distrustful of that model in that case. There's no logical reason to not just axiomatically accept agency ala http://Mr.Land
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fides_et_cancri @mr_scientism
what does that mean "to automatically accept agency"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
As in the model must presume from the get go that it is an agency driven process for sake of discussion without any analogic qualifiers
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I see the utility but I don't see how it bypasses poor explanations or errors. There's no possibility or reason to prove when something is agent driven or not
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fides_et_cancri @mr_scientism
Well, read Sour Grapes first and then we'll talk. Idk if you are talking about a question w/in its scope or beyond it. Obv it can't cover everything
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I still want to read the book on "Darwinian metaphysics" you showed me, and I've found another fascinating french book on similar topic, btw
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
villareal, origin of group identity (iirc villareal is french but the book is translated)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.