When you use “duh” like that, at least use it for something that is factually representative. Sin is not an applicable term with absolute meaning. To me, it means nothing. To other religions or sects of your own religion, what is sinful and not sinful could be entirely different.
so you're saying binge-drinkers don't have equal rights? smdh. They're americans too, my fellow
-
-
That has nothing to do with my response at all.
-
That’s a stupid question.
-
well, you see where you're leading the conversation! only equals can have equal rights. heavy drinkers are equal to non-drinkers in some respects (eg right to vote) but not in others (eg right to be employed)
-
Wrong. A heavy drinker has every right to be employed. If their drinking impedes their performance though, then there’s an issue. A person being gay is not a person on a substance. You are trying to equate very different things. It’s very misleading and very dishonest of you.
-
not at Alcoholics Anonymous, lol. And the q of whether they are or not is adjudicated by the EEOC, and not simply for groups which use public money
-
You are entirely missing the point and are being purposefully misleading by now. Alcohol is a substance that impairs the ability of an individual. Being gay is a biological matter that impairs no one. What you are trying to equate does not work.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.