It's a little ambiguous, I would have to check my notes (and realistically, the German too, bc the newer editions are way more accurate than the version that got translated into English)
He lumps "Roman and Slavonic" peoples together when talking about big Prot/Papist differences and the transitional areas in Central Europe, but his main conceptual point is about the Roman/Med countries, specifically
-
-
(outside of the context of the Reformation, the Eastern Orthodox Church is discussed with Byzantium, the original nomadic Slavs are treated as part of "Germania", i.e. the descent of nomads onto the Roman Empire, and also -)
-
(-he makes an offhand comment saying that Russia and America "haven't had a history yet" and predicts future development into two empires and conflict between them, which is why there was a Hegel renaissance in 1930s)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.