Even Anglo-Saxon fantasy focuses lovingly on artifacts, relics, etc Tolkien wrote whole chapters about knick-knacks
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
what happened to the english in the 17th century? they weren't always so autistic
-
idk if 'tism is right model, but anyway; Anglicism is pre-17th c. Scotus + Occam + Bacon + Wycliffe... there was history
-
(Or are you trying to imply that Cranmer, Bacon, Dunne, and Shakespeare were somehow un-Anglo? I doubt it tbqh)
-
.
@QuasLacrimas I don't believe More, Elyot, Hooker, Spenser, Shakespeare were 'rationalists' in modern sense evidently Bacon, Hobbes were -
.
@QuasLacrimas e.g. for the former, traditional authority, rhetoric, the muses, were all normal considerations in the study of man. -
.
@QuasLacrimas the latter were trained in this way but really seem to have set out to undermine or even to openly attack it -
.
@QuasLacrimas as for Donne, even here something weird has happened. Shakespeare mixes metaphors, Donne has singular, consistent 'conceits' -
In his plays maybe but WS and Donne are both great at sonnets
- 10 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
is this how we know that our setting is a shitty cyberpunk? because jews are literary knockoffs of anglos?
-
Jews start w bare bones of cyberpunk and think that to copy it they need to dial the "punk" up to 11; embarrassing lvls of degen
-
hmmm certainly seems to apply
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.