I think when we were discussing virtue signals I promised a full explanation later @AngloRemnant: voilà
-
-
-
Fun piece. I agree with the praxis. Humor and irony is the best tack for our bright ones against cathedral..
-
Those very secure in their status can get away with fun that is less oblique. But that doesn't scale.
-
Right. "Status" is so nebulous, but if I follow ur logic: this is one reason why pseudonyms and other multi-channel comms work
-
Yes. Your negotiation example is apt. Much of the signaling there is actually signaling of leverage. Pseudos disable that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
.
@QuasLacrimas earlier pieces were in many respects better-written... having a few ppl read me led to carelessnesshttps://quaslacrimas.wordpress.com/2016/08/16/thenatsocraticmethod/ … -
.
@QuasLacrimas ^This one covers same topic but from a different side... not trying to analyze it (obv, SM analysis is better) but EXPRESS it -
.
@QuasLacrimas I have more fun writing the nerdier pieces but I've strayed away from what I wanted: essays that are a fit for the *reader*!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
^ I had a few stray thoughts that didn't fit into the flow of the essay that might interest some of you https://quaslacrimas.wordpress.com/2017/02/07/parergon-group-dynamics-of-virtue-signaling-covering-fire-purity-spirals/ …
-
No, I did not ask him to provide me with illustrations of virtue signals and purity signals; life is just serendipitouspic.twitter.com/GTP9Ezl8xU
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.