The left on Zimmerman: "Trayvon was justified in bashing Zimmerman's head into concrete because Zimmerman was watching creepily"
-
-
Replying to @HbdNrx
(Therefore Zimmerman's self-defense was unjustified) Basically the same thing about Spencer: "punch was ok because he said mean things"
2 replies 14 retweets 22 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
The left has consistently been expanding what harm and "violence" mean in order to justify their violent people. Now speech is "violent"
3 replies 19 retweets 30 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
And therefore "violent" speech (ie speech they disagree with) must be met with violence. This is completely outside the American tradition.
4 replies 11 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
It actually is within our tradition: that's why "fascism" means precisely this inside the anglospherehttps://quaslacrimas.wordpress.com/2016/12/17/political-concepts-fascism/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @QuasLacrimas
the familiar American tradition is that speech does not justify a violent response, hence the first amendment
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @HbdNrx
But the reality is that distortion of political process by violent protesters is the only aspect of fascism w/ any resonance in US
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @QuasLacrimas
normally we think of protesters as nonviolent: holding signs, chanting, marching
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Lol that is because we've been brainwashed
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.