Both terms are A-OK! I double-checked with the Vatican Imho "ordination" helped make the "Open Question Argument" clearer-
-
-
Replying to @MichaelPascal21
No one ever expects the Argentine Inquisition! So if you look here (i know i know): http://courseweb.stthomas.edu/jmjoncas/LiturgicalStudiesInternetLinks/ChristianWorship/Texts/Centuries/Texts_1900_2000CE/RCWorshipTexts1900_2000CE/Rite_of_Ordination_of_a_Bishop.htm …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @QuasLacrimas @MichaelPascal21
...the whole ritual ORDAINS a new bishop. Within the ritual, there is a role for up to three bishops as consecrators
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MichaelPascal21
Well: if we want semantic distinctions, in ANY ritual we can distinguish between result of ritual and roles w/in ritual
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @QuasLacrimas @MichaelPascal21
The '68 ritual I linked makes it particularly clear: it's an ordination ritual whose participants include consecrators
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
If this seems pedantic we don't need to draw any semantic distinction at all tho; it's just a line of deennse vs pedantry!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.