See my point in the Tweetstorm re: violent Righty movements being doomed. But people will think about this, anyway.https://twitter.com/QuasLacrimas/status/820343473706508288 …
-
-
Replying to @hradzka
Do you think there's no difference btwn a violent RW movement & taking measures to protect eccentrics who deviate from party line?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @QuasLacrimas
I think Righties should think about measures to help the people Lefties disemploy before thinking about safehouses.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @hradzka
Okay, that is definitely true! But I fwd'd my friends tweet because my q is, Should we be doing this y/n? Not, Is it top priority?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @QuasLacrimas
Think about it this way: what's a safehouse? It's extra property. What do you need to have one? People with extra property.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @hradzka @QuasLacrimas
So, go find people who have extra property, meaning people with a little organization and resources. That's step one.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @hradzka @QuasLacrimas
Step two: realizing that *they could probably be more useful doing something other than waiting for the phone to ring!*
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hradzka
That's kinda the point, no? Part of value of combined arms is: ppl who don't want to aid every day, might aid in rare crises
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Like: you don't need to solve the problem of getting donations for fashy podcasts before moving on to disemployment, and so on
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
account:
>to be effective the Right must make long term support avail to actual revolutionaries: lawyers and safehouses.