See my point in the Tweetstorm re: violent Righty movements being doomed. But people will think about this, anyway.https://twitter.com/QuasLacrimas/status/820343473706508288 …
Do you think there's no difference btwn a violent RW movement & taking measures to protect eccentrics who deviate from party line?
-
-
I think Righties should think about measures to help the people Lefties disemploy before thinking about safehouses.
-
Okay, that is definitely true! But I fwd'd my friends tweet because my q is, Should we be doing this y/n? Not, Is it top priority?
-
Think about it this way: what's a safehouse? It's extra property. What do you need to have one? People with extra property.
-
So, go find people who have extra property, meaning people with a little organization and resources. That's step one.
-
Step two: realizing that *they could probably be more useful doing something other than waiting for the phone to ring!*
-
That's kinda the point, no? Part of value of combined arms is: ppl who don't want to aid every day, might aid in rare crises
-
Like: you don't need to solve the problem of getting donations for fashy podcasts before moving on to disemployment, and so on
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
account:
>to be effective the Right must make long term support avail to actual revolutionaries: lawyers and safehouses.