if you remove people who make it harder for potential components of agentive networks to form networks, you get more networks › more agency
-
-
-
Replying to @0xa59a2d
the important thing is to reclaim the cities and find a way to keep undesirable elements out other than just never building
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @riyenakshi
my good buddy is preoccupied with permanently entryism resistant systems structures. it is a wicked problem
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @riyenakshi @0xa59a2d
Y? There are invasion-resistant networking strategies at the dumbest level; a generalization shouldn't be impossible
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @QuasLacrimas @0xa59a2d
how so, also everything depends on humans and humans aren't reliable the way machines are
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @riyenakshi @0xa59a2d
Like, in game-theoretic models w/ repeated interactions, tit-for-tat isn't invadable;
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @QuasLacrimas @0xa59a2d
w/o repeat interactions but w/ group identity, ethnocentrism isn't sustainably invadable;
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @QuasLacrimas @0xa59a2d
entryism into networks is another permutation of the same q & may be damn hard but definitely not a priori insoluble
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
(and "definitely not" is a cocky invitation to shut me up by showing there's already a theorem saying otherwise)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.