if you remove people who make it harder for potential components of agentive networks to form networks, you get more networks › more agency
Like, in game-theoretic models w/ repeated interactions, tit-for-tat isn't invadable;
-
-
w/o repeat interactions but w/ group identity, ethnocentrism isn't sustainably invadable;
-
entryism into networks is another permutation of the same q & may be damn hard but definitely not a priori insoluble
-
(and "definitely not" is a cocky invitation to shut me up by showing there's already a theorem saying otherwise)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.