Has anyone considered that one of the reasons is that communists killed it with salami tactics? Because that's, um, true.
-
-
Replying to @riyenakshi
There are people who have been campaigning against me for years, who I can't name in public because they might fucking SWAT me.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @riyenakshi
Some of them are very well embedded in the scene, despite that they've never done anything of note besides seek subcultural power.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @riyenakshi
They don't contribute. They never will. They claw their way into interesting scenes and strangle the life out of them for political gain.
2 replies 0 retweets 19 likes -
Replying to @riyenakshi
And now that they've latched onto it, it's dead. It probably can't be revived. We'll have to go somewhere else, until they find it.
3 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @riyenakshi
So does this mean you don't think the "nerd cult" model is fundamentally flawed? That'd be my first guess
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @QuasLacrimas
https://meaningness.com/metablog/geeks-mops-sociopaths … its a little played out but this was always a good map to me
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ViddyMalchick
Looks interesting, will read. I don't think subcultures are dead per se, but that specific kind, yes
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @QuasLacrimas
I wouldn't even say they're dead, just that the cycle moves infinitely faster with the advent of the internet
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ViddyMalchick
That's possible. It also changes the relationship between visibility cycle and viability cycle
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
like some subcultures I'd call dead-dead-dead will churn away forever and ever in the dark recesses of the web
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.