i think it holds appeal for some ppl. like steam punks, they try to imagine a situation where technology is 'wonder-ful'
-
-
Replying to @Peter_OTool
.@carnapbot2000 i suppose that is the real question - can technology ever be wonderful?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Peter_OTool
i am somewhere near martin heidegger and william morris on the TQ
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Peter_OTool
I'm pro-Heidegger conceptually, but I don't think his tools for thinking about techne point to any special pro/anti conclusion.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @QuasLacrimas
he was certainly anti- but so far anti- that he attempted to 're-orient' technology rather than simply oppose it
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Peter_OTool
his early use of augustine on time was not simply the vestige of 'christian' schooling - he wrote that 'the arrow of time'
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Peter_OTool
i.e. that time should travel forward only, was a kind of non-quantifiable 'blindspot' in modern mathematical sciences
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @Peter_OTool
for reasons; even thinking about Div II gives me ptsd
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Division Two of Being and Time
-
-
Replying to @QuasLacrimas
heidegger is poorly taught. his problems are taken out of their context imo
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.