Bottom line is (his discussions at UCBerk bear this out) Foucault was either a master ironist or pretty philosophically naive
I had the same basic rx to his dialogues w/ Maoists, which were illiberal in the same way but I read more carefully.
-
-
-
Normative questions just didn't occur to him. And he was aggrégé, and had a special interest in Kant, so... it's odd
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.