With this in mind, improvement of stations is seen as a matter of customer service which *also* creates business and boosts profit
to be clear, 34% non-transportation revenue is from real estate inside the stations themselves? (And is profit % equal?)
-
-
not only real estate in stations--other services as well. Not sure abt % of profits tho, didn't say
-
I guess I mean, do they have a real estate empire on the side à la the old Pacific Union, or is it all a byproduct of RR?
-
all their real estate is directly rail-related, no large landholdings elsewhere
-
interesting... makes me curious about the political economy of rail elsewhere
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.