an agent which minimizes expectation would find random static even better than random channels
-
-
Replying to @fire__exit
right but we have frames such that we pre-process static as “static” (regardless of pixel states) whereas we don’t process permutations of relations states between, say, batters and bases that way
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
i think that's only bc the static doesn't give any information, so there's no reason to consider it beyond "this is static"
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @fire__exit
right but that begs the question of how we know static contains no information... you can use static as rng sees to make intriguing visual patterns
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
that's a good point, and it feels like a cop-out to just say "everything is noise without imposing a representation on it"
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fire__exit @QuasLacrimas
and in fact it seems false considering humans perceive the world the way they do presumably bc it's advantageous to do so
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @notaquatica @fire__exit
i can’t tell the difference between feeling subsonic vibrations in my arm and hearing them - there is literally no qualitative difference to me
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @notaquatica @fire__exit
Oh yeah. Apparently Noé uses these freq in his films
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
This also suggests strong role for selection pressure in liturgical music since we literally can’t hear the frequencies causing the most relevant emotional reactions
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.