How is that a counter-example
-
-
Replying to @QuasLacrimas
the tv playing random channels is hinting at something about what humans do, but minimizing expectation is not what humans do
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fire__exit @QuasLacrimas
an agent which minimizes expectation would find random static even better than random channels
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @fire__exit
right but we have frames such that we pre-process static as “static” (regardless of pixel states) whereas we don’t process permutations of relations states between, say, batters and bases that way
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
i think that's only bc the static doesn't give any information, so there's no reason to consider it beyond "this is static"
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @fire__exit
right but that begs the question of how we know static contains no information... you can use static as rng sees to make intriguing visual patterns
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
that's a good point, and it feels like a cop-out to just say "everything is noise without imposing a representation on it"
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fire__exit
in what sense (maybe it sounds better in german - “content without concepts are blind, concepts without content are empty”)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @QuasLacrimas
if i head over to oeis and pick a random integer sequence to show someone they might see it as just picking numbers out of a hat
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @fire__exit @QuasLacrimas
but once i tell them whatever rules generate these, the sequence is suddenly much more meaningful
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.