Ipseity as a biological, political, social, etc. construct. You can believe it literally exists in some sense or you can believe it's really some kind of administrative strategy that's been reified, I'm inclined towards the latter, would like at least to imagine alternatives.
-
-
Replying to @insurrealist @FakkaFranz
I'm inclined towards the latter. How would we move beyond?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @masondemaistre @FakkaFranz
I have no idea but my current strategy is to try to understand it well enough to reinterpret it under transcendental syntax.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
-
Replying to @insurrealist @FakkaFranz
I don't necessary *recommend* him... just this project of transcendental rejection of the self has been tried before and it leads to militant progressivism
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
(because the only way to interpret the post-self as nonetheless having selflike properties is, with respect to the "promethean" capabilities of "the human race" or its techno-social agglomerations, as these organize themselves in time)
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
pq?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It is about many things but mostly the transformation of humanity from reaching for spiritual heights, to men placing men at the top of the hierarchy as the beginning of modernity. It's brilliant but a lot to unpack.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
i hope to get to slojterdijk someday. do you think this is better than critique of cynical reason?
-
-
that will be my next read. His writing and erudition is worth it alone.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.