tfw no formal definition of elegance
-
-
Replying to @insurrealist
All you need are definitions of depth and complexity; then elegance is simple depth. Complexity is a measure of the length or difficulty of applying the system’s rules, depth a measure of the difficulty of predicting its properties
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @QuasLacrimas
Another thing I dislike is when a word is an antonym for multiple words, like simple, complicated and complex or good, bad and evil. Why people gotta be like that?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @insurrealist
Those words are the best - how else could you peer into the mind of God with an etymological dictionary?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @QuasLacrimas
I like paradox, not vagueness or imprecision, that's just messy lol. People have also failed to come up with decent surrogates for body language, tangentially. There should be sigils for emotional valence as additional context.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @insurrealist
You think?
I think you’ve really never studied historical semantics, have you? you’re in for a treat1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @QuasLacrimas
Emoticons and emojis look stupid and are like at cave painting level. Just can't expect people to have enough discernment and insight to get anything better, I guess.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
All signs, gestures manners look stupid; they are clothed in spirit by the conventions that give them definition and sharp edges
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.