Conversation

my favorite size for a group conversation irl is 2-4 people and usually i hope that in any larger group the conversation naturally fragments into smaller clusters of 2-4 people. larger than that and conversations risk getting taken over by the person with the fastest tempo
10
17
282
by "tempo" i don't exactly mean the person who talks the fastest although that's correlated. i mean the person who interrupts the most quickly after someone else says something. ime almost always male, almost always someone who is not tracking quiet slow ppl in the conversation
1
54
in a 5+ person conversation with a person with fast tempo i get frustrated by the sense that i have to increase my tempo to stay in the conversation. i can do this but i don't enjoy it. it rushes my breathing and my thoughts, and quieter slower ppl get further crowded out
2
1
51
it's especially frustrating if you've just met and don't know each other well and there isn't necessarily trust and social buy-in in the air to make relatively aggressive moves like pointing out, live, that someone's tempo is too high and it's crowding other ppl out
2
28
Replying to
also naturally part of the reason why this gets me going is because i also used to be more of a fast-tempo person who wasn't tracking quieter slower people until i got a bunch of feedback about this 😅
3
34
Replying to
i learned recently that vr meetups actually work waay better than zoom for this! (bc at vibe camp told me about their vr meetup) you can have dozens of ppl at a vr meetup together but it naturally breaks into small groups because you have body language and walking around
2
4
& actually you don't even need vr, because (for example) you can get vrchat on steam *without* vr, just walking around with WASD+mouse on a laptop turns out the important part isn't the "immersion" or hardware—it's just the spatial metaphor for conversations that makes it work
1
3