Conversation

QC (in Berlin 7/29-???)
@QiaochuYuan
i get the sense reading this stuff from the 1930s that the first half of the twentieth century was a time when physics seemed like a *really big deal*. relativity, quantum mechanics, the atom bomb. seems like science fiction grew out of this awe at the power of physics
Quote Tweet
QC (in Berlin 7/29-???)
@QiaochuYuan
·
one thing that really strikes me here is that lovecraft and eddington share a strong concern with understanding the *spiritual significance* of discoveries in physics and astronomy. lovecraft wants to know: what does it *mean* that the universe is so vast and empty?
Show this thread
3
2
44
QC (in Berlin 7/29-???)
@QiaochuYuan
it's striking because now arguably nothing *really* interesting has happened in physics for decades. even the discovery of the higgs boson at the LHC was ultimately a yawn. i don't think any scifi authors found anything interesting to do with it
3
8
QC (in Berlin 7/29-???)
@QiaochuYuan
the intellectuals who seem powerful now aren't physicists anymore. i think it was tech founders for awhile and maybe that's sort of mixed with crypto people now. which is interesting because many people actively hate and resent these people for having power
1
5
QC (in Berlin 7/29-???)
@QiaochuYuan
Replying to
@QiaochuYuan
you can tell it feels uninspiring because it hasn't inspired good art (that i know of, maybe the social network movie idk i haven't seen it). nobody invented a new genre of fiction based around techbros and cryptobros, they just make fun of them with memes
2
6
QC (in Berlin 7/29-???)
@QiaochuYuan
people living in the... idk 1930s-1960s? lived in a world where scientific progress was regularly leading to technological progress and that must've been an inspiring world to live in. these days our "new technologies" are mostly just better forms of exploitation afaict
2
1
9
QC (in Berlin 7/29-???)
@QiaochuYuan
among other things i wonder: what is the science fiction of this era? as in what is the form or forms of art that accurately reflect our current preoccupations and point us forward to something new? (the newness is important so we don't just get stuck in dystopias)
2
6
QC (in Berlin 7/29-???)
@QiaochuYuan
maybe i'm just rehashing great stagnation type stuff here but it's interesting to me to look specifically at the impact of rapid vs. stagnant scientific and technological progress on art
2
7