Most interesting thing I learned about myself in the last decade (thanks to that one post by the Facebook guy): I have aphantasia, which explains like 90% of my thinking.
I try to think about this sometimes but very quickly lose track with what I am or am not doing under the banner of “visualization” I mean it’s not literally like seeing of course and then train of thought loses the plot
Do you mean to tell me that most people can literally have at will the brain state that is otherwise produced involuntarily by seeing (presumably) real objects out in the world ?
wait i don't believe this is what people mean when they say they can visualize. i think there are two different visual spaces, the "actual" visual field and the "mind's eye," and visualization refers to the latter. i think i ran a poll about this
there are (at least) two different “spaces” at play i think. psychedelic visuals are happening in my “actual visual field.” the rest of the time when i say i’m visualizing something it’s in my “mind’s eye.” like the diff between hallucinating vs. remembering a song twitter.com/_holyweather/s…
poll: when you visualize images (e.g. recall a visual memory) do those images appear in your "actual" visual field (superimposed over your actual vision) or in your "mind's eye" (a separate space from your actual vision)?
there's like tests for aphantasia and literature on it... your analysis seems like shitpost half-assery tbf :D
from how they describe it, I think normies can actually see fairly hi-fi reconstructed remembered scenes in visual field
if it's that, I absolutely cannot do it, and on those scales with drawings of what you minds eye see I am like bottom fidelity or next to bottom every time