the fact that psychology majors don’t have a reputation as being particularly charismatic or good at relationships or even at managing people is a pretty damning indictment of either academic psychology or college or both
Historical reasons? Academic psychology was behaviorism for decades, and the paradigm after that was the cognitive revolution. Neither of them are "how do you be", they're very much "how does it work"
The more humanistic side of psychology was torn between Social Psychology (the situation matters) and Personality Psychology (the person matters).
For some reason Social Psych won and ate Personality, but again neither of them are about being charismatic or having relationships
1
4
Show replies
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
yeah and|but it's done in a way that privileges internal consistency and performative healing over learning how to relate to other humans from the damaged core.
being able to rationalize to yourself 'oh, i'm not damaged anymore' doesn't help if other people are still a mystery