Conversation

QC (in Berlin 7/29-???)

if GPT-3 can do the homework you assign your students then the homework you assign your students is fake notice what you did *not* say: "finally, GPT-3 will save us so much time analyzing international relations"

Quote Tweet

I had GPT-3 answer the kinds of questions I might ask undergraduate international relations students. These answers are all 100% AI-generated. Educators (like me) whose assessments rely mostly on student writing are going to have to adjust to a world where AI can do this.

Show this thread

21

173

939

QC (in Berlin 7/29-???)

if the homework you assign students is to build a chair and then they have to bring the chair into class and you sit on it, that is *not fake*. if a machine solved this problem for them it would *actually produce real chairs people could actually use*

4

11

238

QC (in Berlin 7/29-???)

this essay question garbage is fundamentally fake. every student knows the goal is to write some bullshit that sounds good enough that you're willing to assign it a good grade. you are not actually training the students to perform any kind of useful work and you never were

2

29

345

QC (in Berlin 7/29-???)

here's the opening of an essay i wrote as a sophomore in college. i don't remember writing this. i don't know a single thing about fMRI or the patriot act. i bullshitted this whole thing. this is what happens when you force students to write about shit they don't care about

3

4

205

QC (in Berlin 7/29-???)

this whole thing might as well have been generated by GPT-3 for all anyone could tell by reading it; it contains none of my actual writing voice, which i would not get back for another 8 years. there's none of my personality or life experience or soul in here

1

3

180

QC (in Berlin 7/29-???)

i want to clarify here that i'm using "bullshit" in harry frankfurt's technical sense, and specifically as distinct from lying: when you lie you try to hide the truth, when you bullshit you don't care either way what the truth is www2.csudh.edu/ccauthen/576f1

2

12

200

QC (in Berlin 7/29-???)

GPT-3 is literally a bullshit engine. it does not have a concept of words as referring to things; it plays games with words *only*, pure syntax, no semantics. literally the thing it is optimizing for when it produces text can be condensed to "put words here that sound good"

7

49

307

QC (in Berlin 7/29-???)

if GPT-3 can answer the essay questions you've assigned as homework then you've learned that your essay questions were optimized for producing bullshit, in the specific sense of words that sound good but are indifferent to their own truth or falsehood

7

96

436

QC (in Berlin 7/29-???)

spending a decade training students to orient towards writing as mainly about bullshit is not the profound education in the humanities some people want it to be. any actual writing ability i have now i trained on MSN messenger, livejournal, forums, social media

1

17

195

QC (in Berlin 7/29-???)

only has a job as a writing coach because school has so thoroughly destroyed so many people's relationships to writing. people who have entire books in them live in fear of Doing The Homework Wrong

Quote Tweet

Replying to @QiaochuYuan

I’ve worked with at least three people who are Pulitzer level talents just quietly wondering whether they should disturb the universe

6:32 PM · Apr 16, 2022Twitter Web App

QC (in Berlin 7/29-???)

Replying to

writing in lowercase is magic because it doesn't activate the Uppercase Context. Uppercase is for School and Work; in other words, it's writing someone else is forcing you to do. lowercase writing is *consensual*

Quote Tweet

@ungatedcreative

· Dec 28, 2021

i wrote a thing it's about how writing in lowercase has done magical, inexplicable things for my creative output ungated.media/article/lowerc

Show this thread

6

38

205

QC (in Berlin 7/29-???)

in this way i, for one, welcome our machine overlords. if GPT-4 destroys the essay, or the concept of homework entirely, i will cheer and applaud raucously. we do not need them and we never did

2

18

187

QC (in Berlin 7/29-???)

more on GPT-3 as a bullshit engine

Quote Tweet

Linguistic context *correlates* with real-world context, so assembling extremely large amounts of it gives a simulacrum of semantics. Except when it doesn’t, revealing that current language models have zero idea what they are talking about: aiweirdness.com/baltimore-orio

Show this thread

1

8

59

QC (in Berlin 7/29-???)

GPT-3 apparently surprisingly good at generating marketing copy. hmmmm

Quote Tweet

An interesting thing about working with GPT-3 is that you have to fact check /everything/, because it excels at generating convincing text but makes no promises that the facts in that text will be accurate in any way

Show this thread

3

3

49

QC (in Berlin 7/29-???)

"The thing to know about the AI language models, OpenAI’s GPT-3 and its cousins, is that they are fundamentally bullshitters. The bullshit has gotten better and better, but at the core … well, there’s nothing at the core."

Quote Tweet

Doh, don't know why I didn't spot this glaring connection between ML generated outputs and Frankfurtian bullshit. robinsloan.com/lab/notes-on-a

Show this thread

2

2

16

QC (in Berlin 7/29-???)

this feels like it goes here: are greentexts bullshit?

Quote Tweet

Also what does it imply that, out of anything I've seen it try to do, GPT-3 is easily the best at greentext Like, it's a competent sophomore at poetry, a vague freshman at essaycraft, but a PhD in greentext twitter.com/sashachapin/st…

3

8