And if i am a tyre mechanic, i dont charge my friends to just share our feelings/thoughts about tyres. There has to be something i can offer that they cant do for themselves. Which is not to imply any kind of hierarchy At all.
Conversation
yeah i guess to me it appears that — changing shoes on your horse let’s say — is a service with clear boundaries, that is normally performed in return for money but can just as well be done on a favor-for-favor basis …
1
2
… while it appears that the vogue for “life-coaching” is taking a poorly-defined, vaguely-bounded aspect of basic human social bonding and redefining it as a professional service
2
2
and where does this trend end? in a few years will it be normal to charge for eye contact? will my mutuals be claiming to me that the frame of professionalism, the exchange of money, allows for deeper, longer eye contact than they can otherwise offer?
1
1
5
people already charge for cuddling which might offend your sensibilities but like... it gives people access to cuddling which might not otherwise have it, i knew someone who was a professional cuddler and really enjoyed it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
1
4
you seem to be making two assumptions i don't understand, 1) that people already have access to the stuff you regard as a part of ordinary friendship (many don't), and 2) that professionalizing that stuff will result in less access to that stuff (i think it will result in more)
1
4
i also don't charge friends for coaching, it's not about the money, it's about whether we decide we're having a coaching conversation or an ordinary conversation
1
3
sure well i mean i agree with friends we’re going to have an eye-gazing session sometimes too. And it has a clear container. So I get you — kind of
1
2
… because of course the difference is that this does not make me an “eye-gazer”, it is understood to be a mutual activity
1
2
are your pro cuddler friends especially good at it? do they get less out of it than the cuddlees? real question. but i imagine you will say — no — the point is they are democratizing access to cuddles
1
3
probably and idk. is the mutuality the key sticking point for you here? can you say more about that?