what’s good about whatever civilization is? what’s bad about it? what is it?
Conversation
"infants did not have to wait helplessly to have their needs met. They had no emotional need to anchor their libidos to abstract concepts of time, place, or kinship; and abstract foundations of awareness such as these were not imprinted on their nascent consciousness"
1
13
vs
"a psychological transformation commenced, one that focused with growing intensity on emergent cognitive abstractions and symbols by which to anchor claims to property. As these took hold, possessiveness evolved as a basic human trait."
1
9
given how much of a touchstone this essay is, i really wish i had more context on this sorenson guy and whether he's legit, or whether it's been corroborated by other anthropologists
1
6
me too
while i understand that the world was entirely different for the vast majority of humans, and that this ofc shaped and shapes us, i’m always skeptical of unfalsifiable assumptions about others’ consciousnesses
1
8
Show replies
maybe related: the parallel between what e o wilson called the "naturalist's trance", gatherer-hunter consciousness, and zazen
bodymindworld
1
5
yeah this feels like the most generative wedge to me between “civilization” and “pre-civilization” when de-moored (ha!) from its colloquial associations ·
words / concepts / duality / “time” vs. pre-duality ·
1