Conversation

one of the ideas that fucks me up the most is the possibility that people who strongly believe some psychological theory will sort of polarize everyone around them into acting in accordance with that theory
13
16
243
i suppose insofar as this sort of thing happens the decent thing to do is to err on the side of believing psychological theories that attribute people a lot of agency and fundamental goodness
Quote Tweet
coherence therapy calls this "symptom coherence" - taking the stance that every thing you do that drives you nuts makes deep sense once you get the underlying emotional reality that's driving it. it very cleanly articulates something i've been grasping at for years and years
Show this thread
1
44
also relevant to questions like "why is everyone's psych book full of case studies of patients for whom that specific psych method works so perfectly" presumably there are multiple selection effects going on, and then perhaps more subtle influence stuff?
3
29
I think this whole thing makes a great deal of sense, if we think of therapy as borne out of a conversation, and that conversation itself is a cybernetic feedback loop that is constantly adjusting and steering based off of the tendencies of each actor
1
2
maybe it's not so much polarization as "we steer us towards the things we both enjoy". which is indeed pretty freaky, to be honest. which implies that therapy actually thus has affects based on the therapist, which is something I've always suspected; that therapy is never neutral
2
2
Show replies