Conversation

It also helps to know that you will screw things up in trying to implement non-coercion (I struggle with it a LOT with my kids). Not setting a high standard for yourself it get everything right perfectly, immediately, is a gentler, non-coercive attitude to non-coercion.
1
2
The bit I struggle with is, I believe there are techniques that can unlock the ability to more frequently live by means of non-coercion But I find it very hard to non-coercively start ๐Ÿ˜… I imagine this is an issue of patience Waiting for non-coercive opportunities to arise
2
2
Yeah I think I might put this differently now. I think there is some amount of coercion at first, but the goal is to be "relatively non-coercive" compared to your existing methods.
1
2
Oh yeah this is good. Someone was asking me about this the other day because there's a Sutra where the Buddha recommends you "Beat Down, Constrain, and Crush" unwholesome thoughts.
Image
2
3
They asked how I view that in relation to non-coercion, and my response is that sometimes, your mind is in such a state that beating down, constraining, and crushing is the most self-loving non-coercive thing you can do. It's more coercive to make certain actions off-limits.
2
4
I actually donโ€™t think thereโ€™s anything coercive about crushing unwholesome thoughts, as long as we donโ€™t identify with the thoughts themselves. The thought is not the โ€œpartโ€ (in the IFS sense). We should be gentle with the part that holds the thought, though.
2
3
ah the shame of replying to tweets on the TL out of context lol *head down because you already said what i chimed in with* ๐Ÿ˜…
1
2
Don't encourage this or I'll start replying to everyone's tweets just rephrasing what they said ๐Ÿคฃ 2022 challenge: 100 rephrased tweets
2
4