Conversation

Replying to
i was partly convinced that this was somewhat overstating the case, but: bad statistics
Quote Tweet
it's ludicrous how few people know about this paper, so, friendly reminder that the fermi paradox was completely resolved in 2018 and it turned out to be because multiplying point estimates of highly uncertain parameters is very bad actually arxiv.org/abs/1806.02404
Show this thread
Image
Image
Show replies
Isn't this paper saying "you can't multiply probabilities you're uncertain about to get a probability"? Isn't that sort of a non sequitur to the question raised above which to me is more asking "which term in drake's equation are we actually wrong about"?
1
1
It's like: "Hmm, I've used my best estimates to make a prediction which doesn't match reality" and the paper's response is "you shouldn't be surprised your best estimates didn't make an accurate prediction" but that leaves the question of which best estimate is wrong.
1