Conversation

"mere" perception - one of the weirdest implicit beliefs floating around is that psychology is somehow separate from biology. mind-body dualism runs deep
Quote Tweet
It’s remarkable that, *far more than any of our own behaviors (besides mating)* observing the successful aggression of others we deem “our team” raises our testosterone levels most. This is true for both males and females. The takeaway: mere perceptions can influence hormones.
Show this thread
you have to be really science-cucked to reflexively speak as if *perceptions* are less real than *hormones*. have you ever seen a hormone? touched one? tasted one? how do you know they exist?
5
6
96
this is important shit and i'm gonna keep being mad about it. the undermining of direct perception is one of the biggest tools of social control. it is the meta-gaslighting that enables other forms of gaslighting. it's one of the worst parts of the "i fucking love science" meme
2
14
186
where the flip side of "i fucking love science" is "i fucking hate anecdotes" - your observations, your perceptions, your experiences, don't count because they're N=1. this is bullshit and you don't have to put up with it. science is not more real than your life
7
19
176
i'm still mad at the people who read about curing his anosmia with acid and were like "well he's probably wrong about his own experience" - jesus fucking christ are you that afraid of pissing off Daddy Science and believing something he didn't give you permission to
6
4
141
Replying to
Roboticists have been forced to contend with this deeply. It is quite difficult to build a robot whose perception system isn’t tightly coupled to its decision process. We can still “separate” them but increasingly the idea is that there’s a feedback loop b/w them.
1
Probably also an indication that because nature and physics are unforgiving, we’ll learn more about mind/body problems trying to engineer robotic systems that work in the world rather than by studying biological ones.