Both Scotts are sensitive guys. And sensitivity cuts both ways: sensitive people respond strongly to both pain and pleasure, to both themselves and others. The volume knob is turned up. The pain is a call to action.
Conversation
What they could use is a little bit of *doubt*. Take a stand against yourself: what if your self-narratives are wrong? What if the "feminists" are right? What are you doing, in practice, and what do you expect to happen, then how do you respond?
5
40
Replying to
i'll say the same thing i said last time we talked about this: i don't see these things as being in as much tension as you seem to. comment 171 and untitled were very helpful for me in coming to grips with this stuff and probably fed into at least some of the work i did around it
Replying to
i don't necessarily see them as being bad, because both are long and contain a lot, and they make good jumping-off points. but i've also seen people bounce off them and toward political/ideological warfare, because both posts imply that others are who "we" should focus on
1
5
hm yeah that is probably less useful
1
4
Show replies
idk if untitled had any effect on feminists but i think it (together with the other writing scott's done on this topic) probably had an effect on the shape of the funnel directing people to SSC
6

