gonna refocus on D&D and gary gygax b/c i think there's an interesting way D&D serves as a "memetic bottleneck" here. little gary was into LARPing, pulp fiction, and wargames. idk anything about pulp fiction or wargames. let's click on wargames first
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Gyga
Conversation
wargaming was invented in prussia and used for military training; attracted attention b/c they beat france in a war in 1870
h.g. wells "developed codified rules for playing with toy soldiers, which he published in a book titled Little Wars." adorable!
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wargame#W
1
1
8
wow wait okay the full title of the book was
"Little Wars: a game for boys from twelve years of age to one hundred and fifty and for that more intelligent sort of girl who likes boys' games and books"
bruh now it's less adorable c'mon
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Wa
1
10
ok now pulp fiction. this bit seems important: "During the economic hardships of the Great Depression, pulps provided affordable content to the masses, and were one of the primary forms of entertainment, along with film and radio."
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulp_maga
1
1
3
this is starting to feel like a huge topic. here's an incomplete diagram of the influences we've traced so far. i am still mostly drawn to understanding the D&D bottleneck, as the place where pop magic switches tracks from stories to games
2
9
there's something you kill about the nature of magic by forcing it to fit mechanically into a game, tabletop or video or otherwise. the way it's usually done magic becomes something dead you control, rather than something alive you have a relationship to
Quote Tweet
One way to get at the distinction: is magic something you use (LH), or is it something you relate to (RH)? In Young Wizards (RH), magic often uses the heroes. It has intentionality, and also a moral component. Compare to e.g. Harry Potter, esp. HPMoR (very LH).
Show this thread
4
2
13
Kind of reminded of brandonsanderson.com/sandersons-fir, where the author recounts being in a panel on magic in fantasy and holding it self-evident that magic has to have rules, only to be surprised by every other panelist disagreeing with him.
1
3
He makes an interesting point that the more the author wants to use magic for solving problems in the story, the more mechanistic and understandable it has to be - because otherwise it comes across as a deus ex machina. But that easily robs it of some of its, well, magic.
2
1
I know of at least one table-top RPG based on a fantasy setting that solves the problem by restricting all player characters to be non-wizards. Magic is inherently mysterious and as such, has to stay as NPC-only. I don't think that's the only solution but it's a solution.
1
1
Another fun one is Sorcerer ( rpg.net/reviews/archiv ) - oh, all the PCs are magic-users. But they get their power _from_ NPCs: each of them has bound a demon that's the source of their magic. And their relationship is always adversarial in nature.
2
1
