Conversation

people say this kind of shit all the time and i’ve decided i hate it. i think it is deliberately conflating a metaphysical claim with a tactical claim. incidentally, reggie ray, like many spiritual teachers, had himself a classic abuse scandal: matthewremski.com/wordpress/regg
Image
Image
Image
Image
Quote Tweet
A dharma talk by Reggie Ray on the topic of: “there is nothing wrong with you. Nothing to fix. Nothing to run away from or improve. There is no problem. Can you accept that?” I heard it 2-3 years ago and it still wallops me every time I think of it.
3
4
24
promising first page. “...charismatic, authoritarian leaders control their followers’ attachment relationships...” this shines a whole new light for me on the thing where cults like tell their followers who to have sex with and who to marry and stuff. messing with attachment
Image
1
1
17
“But what is the meaning of ‘intentional’ when the self has been hijacked, the core of the follower’s cognitive and emotional self has been pulled into pieces that no longer form a coherent whole?” yo woooord. this is one of the things i was most confused about after my own exp
Image
1
12
Replying to
Yet, i perceive it as dangerous to create a self-optimization program out of buddhism. Often not intended by teachers, yet many pupils including me were hunting imaginations about enlightenment. This turns Buddhism absurdly upside down into a game of hierachies and state hunt.
1
One of the most precious messages is still the intrinsic joy of (no-)self-development. Yet intrinisc joy can be vastly destroyed by hanging up carrots in front of the great vehicle :D