Conversation

oh my god I'm a moron "it changes when we measure ('observe') it bc we *have to interact with it* to do so" this never occurred to me, I just read the popsci explanations like "ha ha well I don't understand that at all, guess I'm never going to think about it again"
Quote Tweet
I'm going to be that guy: the monkey should be a light beam, everyone confuses consciousness interfering with the particle-wave duality. But to observe it we have to measure it with a photon, which causes a physical interaction, it's not consciousness doing it its a particle
8
2
88
pendants on twitter hopping out from behind a bush with good intuitive explanations that don't trigger any of my "lol this is too hard" defenses: bless you
1
1
30
"by observe, we mean 'measure,' and by 'measure,' we mean 'physically interact with,' and perhaps you can understand why it is hard to do this without kinda fucking with the thing you are measuring" nobody ever just said this to me
7
4
57
so, this is true and relevant, but it’s not a complete explanation of the uncertainty principle (which i assume is the topic under discussion), because it’s not intrinsically quantum i am not aware of a really satisfying intuitive explanation of the uncertainty principle
3
16
Show replies