“but QC tell us your object-level takes”
my object-level takes are easily guessed, scott good, NYT bad, if you want more detail than that buy me dinner first
Conversation
when i wrote the rationalist thread awhile back someone said something like “actually high-quality good-faith criticism of the rationalists is incredibly rare and you’re in an unusually good position to provide it” and i am having thonks about that
3
49
really weird thinking about how i, personally, could write an actually good constructive critique of the rationalists that would blow this piece out of the water along every possible dimension
6
68
actually it would be more fun to talk about this than write about this. podcast? clubhouse room? hmmmmmm
2
24
I would clubhouse about this
4
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm still a little nervous but could be fun 😅
1
1
Doesn’t have to be a big/public room
1
2
I'd love to know your opinions, QC, but I don't have clubhouse, please also publish!
1
4
Seconded!
1
3
yeah on second thought clubhouse is too exclusionary, i want this to be public
any podcasting friends wanna interview me on short notice?
, @collinofzion? ideal timing is literally today to ride the wave and better if the interviewer has some context about rats
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
agh it’d be a lot more fun in dialogue
hmm
i think there are easy ways to go live with multiple people on like youtube or something right? i did that once
1
do you have my email? eigenbmo@gmail.com, can send you link to a recording room and turn this around
1
2
Show replies
Show more replies