IFS actually has language / concepts for dealing with parts that are "not you," it calls the good ones "guides" and the bad ones "critters"
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Conversation
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
i actually don't have very much experience with it, might be able to say more. i have watched parts of a long training video by richard schwarz which was fascinating but i think you need to pay real money for it
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Plurality stuff goes into this too, it's somewhere between the dryness of IFS and magic approaches honestly
see e.g. this primer
Quote Tweet
seems like a good read on plurality / multiplicity / systems
di.org.au/about-multipli
2
For a "what *is* IFS" overview I would recommend elemental.medium.com/inside-the-rev if you like text or youtube.com/watch?v=tezLxo if you prefer video (gets going at the 4 minute mark). If you like text and are STEM-minded there's also my own lesswrong.com/posts/5gfqG3Xc .
1
1
2
(If I had to pick just one of those I'd recommend the video.)
For "how to *do* IFS", the video gets into it a bit but the most detailed how-to guide is smile.amazon.com/Self-Therapy-S . A nice complement is smile.amazon.com/Power-Focusing , technically about Focusing but very IFS-like in style.
1
1
Show replies