Conversation

this is one of the things i found refreshing about cambridge too, that their conception of the relationship between math and physics was rooted in a history of not distinguishing them. "classical mechanics" was a *math* class. isaac newton was a *math professor* there
1
25
but it's felt to me for awhile like at some point in the last ~30-100 years mathematicians stopped trying to understand *the world* and i think that was bad actually. mathematics disconnected from the world is just a complicated and engrossing puzzle game
3
2
40
Replying to
i often forget that as a kid before i wanted to be a mathematician i wanted to be a physicist. i had big glossy copies of stephen hawking's "a brief history of time" and "the universe in a nutshell" and they blew my tiny little mind. i used to read pop physics books a lot
Image
Image
2
22
remembering one pop physics book in particular where the author was explaining how he did some very difficult calculation in "perturbation theory" and i was like whoa perturbation theory that sounds tight and now i'm a big boy who knows what that means! sweet
2
28
Replying to
i think some mathematicians would say that math has a telos but in a way more ineffable than physics. that even if the content is massive it isn't like it's disorganized. most probably they would say that stuff like the riemann hypothesis or the langlands program points to it
1
2