Conversation

this is one of the things i found refreshing about cambridge too, that their conception of the relationship between math and physics was rooted in a history of not distinguishing them. "classical mechanics" was a *math* class. isaac newton was a *math professor* there
1
25
i often forget that as a kid before i wanted to be a mathematician i wanted to be a physicist. i had big glossy copies of stephen hawking's "a brief history of time" and "the universe in a nutshell" and they blew my tiny little mind. i used to read pop physics books a lot
Image
Image
2
22
remembering one pop physics book in particular where the author was explaining how he did some very difficult calculation in "perturbation theory" and i was like whoa perturbation theory that sounds tight and now i'm a big boy who knows what that means! sweet
2
28
Replying to
This is a difference between physics and mathematics, theories of physics describe testable regularities by explaining the seen world in terms of the unseen - some of that unseen are mathematical abstractions. Pure mathematics is important, it just isn't the most fundamental
1